As the trend of citizen journalism continues to rise, particularly with the ever-escalating popularity of Internet forums such as Facebook and Twitter, the jobs of hardworking journalists continue to be threatened.
According to Hamilton and Lawrence (2010, p.1) “professional journalism… is rooted in the concept of reporters going out into the world seeking information.” However, it turns out that you do not have to be a professional journalist to undertake this task. Although, the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance defines a journalist as adhering to “the principles of honesty, fairness and independence.” This definition does not apply to citizen journalists.
An example of citizen journalist’s not adhering to the principle of honesty would be the recent and ongoing “Jackie Chan death” rumors. A recent article stated that “In March, news of his death spread virally on Twitter, and fans of the Rush Hour star poured out condolences until it became apparent Chan had not died of a heart attack as the rumor claimed.”
Historically, the citizen’s role was to be informed and the journalist’s role was to uncover and communicate newsworthy events to citizens. In the 21st century however, the role of the citizen has changed. Citizens are now being informed by facilitating conversation and being an active and/or passive audience informing others.
However, according to Gilmor (2008, p.111) “that does not mean there isn’t a place for pro journalists, who will always be there.”
I put this question forward to fellow journalists, whether professional or citizen, “What does this mean for the future of journalism?”
Here is a short video about citizen vs. professional journalism.
References:
LaCapria, K. (2011). Jackie Chan Death Hoax Sweeps Social Media. http://www.inquisitr.com/135052/jackie-chan-dead-august-2011/ Accessed: 19.8.11
Youtube (June 11, 2008). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU5LonkXbCE Accessed: 19.8.11
No comments:
Post a Comment